Amazon Web Services

Source: 2026-09-23 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: A catalog listing only. It does not establish a commercial partnership between Moonshot AI and AWS, usage volumes, regional availability, or whether the models are hosted as fully managed or marketplace offerings.

Source: 2026-09-22 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: A product listing page. It does not establish how much Claude usage or revenue flows through Bedrock rather than Anthropic's own API, the commercial terms between the two companies, or that every listed model is available in every AWS region.

Source: 2026-08-19 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: The post lists availability and list pricing only. It does not disclose the commercial split with AWS, which regions are covered, usage volumes, or whether SpaceXAI buys any compute from AWS in return.

Source: 2026-07-01 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish contract value or exclusivity; reporting on this announcement notes Anduril has also previously partnered with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure on the same Menace-I product.

Source: 2026-06-18 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Secondary reporting (unconfirmed by primary parties) · Reported operating

Limits: The 'lead design partner' characterization comes from press analysis, not an on-record statement by Amazon or Marvell; does not establish contract value or exclusivity.

Source: 2026-04-20 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish exclusivity of Anthropic's compute sourcing -- Anthropic also uses Google Cloud TPUs -- nor that the full 5GW/$100B commitment has been delivered rather than committed.

Source: 2026-04-20 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Anthropic's own statement; it does not establish what share of Anthropic's total training or inference runs on Trainium rather than Google TPUs or NVIDIA GPUs, what Anthropic pays for the chips, or that Trainium3 and Trainium4 have been delivered.

Source: 2026-03-13 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Live, in-production inference collaboration via Amazon Bedrock

Limits: Confirms the technical architecture and Bedrock availability; does not disclose contract value, capacity committed, or customer adoption figures.

Source: 2026-02-26 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating/contracted as of Vistra's Q4 2025 earnings release

Limits: Figures are as self-reported by Vistra in its earnings release; does not establish contract price, exclusivity, or actual current delivered power volumes versus contracted capacity.

Source: 2026-02-10 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: An availability announcement for one model on one date. It does not establish a commercial partnership between MiniMax and AWS, usage volumes, or that MiniMax was involved in the listing beyond releasing open weights.

Source: 2025-12-02 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish exclusivity; Mistral models are also distributed on Azure and Google Cloud Vertex AI.

Source: 2025-09-18 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish exclusivity or a financial relationship beyond standard Bedrock model-hosting terms.

Source: 2025-09-18 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish any formal agreement or payment between DeepSeek and AWS beyond AWS hosting the open-weight model; DeepSeek has not itself confirmed involvement.

Source: 2025-06-11 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Agreement signed; ramp-up to full volume ongoing through 2032

Limits: Confirms a signed long-term power supply and colocation agreement; does not establish current delivered energy volumes, contract price, or that this is AWS's only power arrangement with Talen.

Source: 2025-04-28 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish exclusivity or that AWS is Meta's primary distribution channel; Llama models are also distributed via Azure, Google Cloud and directly by Meta.

Source: 2024-11-07 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish contract value or that AWS is Palantir's exclusive cloud provider; Palantir also partners with other cloud providers.

Source: 2024-10-15 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish exclusive use of Trainium -- Databricks also runs on GPUs and other clouds -- and the $1B run-rate figure is AWS-Marketplace-specific, not total company revenue.

Source: 2024-03-04 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Secondary reporting (unconfirmed by primary parties) · Reported operating

Limits: This is an acquisition of a specific data center campus/asset, not of Talen Energy the company; does not establish current build-out status or that the full 960MW is operational.

Source: 2023-11-30 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Secondary reporting (unconfirmed by primary parties) · Reported operating

Limits: Does not confirm exact process node, order volumes, or a direct contractual relationship, since TSMC declined to comment on individual customers; attribution rests on supply-chain analyst reporting.

Source: 2023-02-22 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Described as a longstanding, ongoing supplier relationship

Limits: Confirms Marvell is described as a semiconductor supplier to AWS; does not name specific chip products (e.g., Trainium), volumes, or contract value, and the source predates 2026 reporting on Amazon's Trainium plans.

Source: 2023-02-21 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Active; integration continued to be referenced in AWS materials as of mid-2026

Limits: Does not establish exclusivity versus Hugging Face's other cloud partnerships (e.g., Google Cloud, Azure) or any revenue/financial terms.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-17

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Product documented

Limits: Availability varies by instance type and region. No purchase volume or exclusivity inferred.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Secondary reporting (unconfirmed by primary parties) · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish contract value, exclusivity, or the proportion of Perplexity's workloads run on AWS versus other providers.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Describes model availability on the Bedrock platform; does not establish contract value, exclusivity, or usage volume.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish revenue share, exclusivity, or usage volume between the companies.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Does not establish exclusivity or revenue share.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Active joint program

Limits: Confirms a joint accelerator program; does not establish that CrowdStrike's core product runs on AWS infrastructure or any exclusive cloud relationship.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Ongoing; multiple Graviton generations in general availability

Limits: Confirms Graviton is Arm-architecture-based and AWS is a listed Arm partner; does not disclose royalty terms, exclusivity, or unit volumes.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Describes interconnection infrastructure only; does not establish revenue, exclusivity, or the volume of AWS traffic carried.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Reported operating

Limits: Covers only OpenAI's open-weight GPT-OSS release, not its proprietary GPT models; does not establish exclusivity or that OpenAI otherwise relies on AWS infrastructure.

Source: 2026-09-09 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Secondary reporting of an on-record executive statement · Historical / announced

Limits: Does not establish that the warrants have vested or that AWS has yet purchased the associated chip volumes; vesting depends on AWS meeting future commercial milestones through 2036.

Source: 2026-09-09 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Secondary reporting of an on-record executive statement · Historical / announced

Limits: Does not establish that the full $60 billion has been contracted or paid; the figure is a ceiling tied to warrant-vesting milestones, not confirmed committed spend to date.

Source: 2026-09-08 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Newly signed multi-generation agreement; first commercial shipments not expected until roughly 2027

Limits: Confirms a signed collaboration and an associated stock-warrant structure; does not confirm current chip shipments, AWS's total future purchase volume, or exclusivity.

Source: 2026-08-04 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Announced

Limits: The earnings release does not disclose the warrant's share count, strike price, vesting terms or dollar value.

Source: 2026-04-20 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Historical / announced

Limits: Does not establish AWS's resulting ownership percentage in Anthropic, or that the full additional $20 billion has been disbursed; figures are as announced, not confirmed as fully funded.

Source: 2026-04-20 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Announced; not confirmed operating

Limits: A stated forward commitment, not money paid. It does not establish that any of the 5 gigawatts has been built or energized, what the payment schedule is, or whether the commitment is enforceable or contingent.

Source: 2025-11-03 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Announced; not confirmed operating

Limits: A contract announcement with a deployment target. It does not establish how much capacity is live today, how much OpenAI has paid, or that the $38 billion figure reflects committed minimums rather than expected spend.

Source: 2025-07-30 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Announced; not confirmed operating

Limits: An announced collaboration. It does not establish that the integration is live, any revenue sharing or commercial terms, exclusivity, or how many customers use the combined service.

Source: 2025-06-11 · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Announced / planned

Limits: Exploratory only -- no SMR technology vendor, capacity, timeline, or investment commitment has been specified; distinct from the companies' existing nuclear power supply agreement.

Source: 2021-11-30 · reviewed 2026-09-20

Evidence: Primary-source statement · Partnership expansion announced November 2021; current operating status not independently reverified

Limits: Source is a 2021 announcement; does not confirm the collaboration's present-day scope, whether it remains active in its original form, or any revenue/contract figures.

Source: 2026-07-07 · reviewed 2026-09-24

Evidence: Analytical comparison · Product/market overlap

Limits: An analyst framing, not a statement by either company. It does not compare capacity, pricing or customer counts, and SpaceX also distributes Grok models through AWS Bedrock.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-17

Evidence: Analytical comparison · Product comparison

Limits: AWS can be an NVIDIA partner and offer alternative chips.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Analytical comparison · Reported operating

Limits: Does not imply any commercial agreement, shared revenue, or relative market share; based on this research's comparison of each company's own product pages.

Source: Source undated · reviewed 2026-09-22

Evidence: Analytical comparison · Reported operating

Limits: Does not imply any commercial agreement or relative market share between the two companies; based on this research's comparison of each company's own product pages.